Tuesday, October 27, 2015

Review: Rotor INpower



When Rotor announced the development of their new INpower system of cycling power measurement earlier this year, I was definitely one of the first to pay attention. The new power meter is housed entirely within the bottom bracket spindle of any of their 30mm BB cranksets, including the battery, which is an easily-replaceable standard AA with a claimed 300+ hours of life. The options include all 30mm models which means their off-road cranksets too. The power is read from the left, non-drive-side, crank arm in this case, whereas most others are on the drive side. Swings and roundabouts right...?

I've been using their cranks for a few years now, and have also become a convert to their Q Ring ovalised chain rings. With the INpower, Rotor offer both the full crank arm set, and the option of just buying a replacement left crank arm. This meant that actually I'd only need to switch out the non-drive-side crank arm on my 3D+ crankset, and I'd be riding with one of the latest power meters on the market, and one that was actually designed to work with the Q Rings to refine the exact position of the oval for maximum pedaling efficiency.


When I put my latest bike together earlier this year, though still unaware of Rotor's big plan, I had included a 3D+ crankset with the MAS (Micro-Adjust Spider). I'd had the plan to add a power meter, but just wasn't sure which one to go for. I currently run a Power2max power meter on another 3D+ set, and though this works perfectly well, they're not that easy to get hold of, and grotesquely over-priced outside of Europe. The INpower was going to cost me just over half of what I was looking at previously. I was a dog with two tails!

So the immediate benefit of this new product was a saving of a good chunk of Euros. However, Rotor also claim that the specific design of the power meter to work with their Q Rings includes an analytical software to determine the optimal position of the ovalised ring to compensate for the dead spots in your pedal stroke.

ON THE ROAD

A direct comparison with my other power meters reveals very similar performance. That means 'good' as far as I'm concerned. It gives me power and cadence with reasonably consistent readings at a comparable time lag of somewhere around a couple of seconds from crank impulse to power displayed. I'm using the Garmin 810 that has been my trusted companion for the past year or so, and the ANT+ wireless communication works. I have to remember to do a power-meter search on the Garmin each time I switch bikes, but it's a necessary pairing of one-to-one as with all of these things.

Loading up the data - my favourite nerdy scientist bit - there are a couple of extra parameters measured that aren't on my previous meters. One is Pedal Smoothness, and the other is Torque Effectiveness. Both are only measured on the left crank arm, though there is a reading given for the right arm. I got some feedback from Rotor on this, after they saw the print-out below from my Garmin Connect, and apparently I may not have calibrated the unit correctly.


After calibrating it again in the way described to me, I came up with numbers that look quite different for the right crank arm so I would guess that I'm closer to the truth now.


One issue with calibration is that in the manual it describes the process in a slightly confusing way. The correct way to calibrate is in 2 steps. Set the calibration on your head unit with the pedal mounted, and the left crank arm in the 6.00 position, then turn the crank backwards 2 full cycles and with the arm in the same position again, press calibrate on the unit a second time. You should apparently not need to re-calibrate again after that.

I did initially have a small issue with this meter in that I found myself changing battery 3 times in the first couple of months, as I would get no reading despite repeated attempts to activate the pairing with my Garmin. It seemed I was not getting anywhere near the 300+ claimed hours of battery life out of it. In retrospect it may just have been a lag in repeated pairing of the Garmin with different power meters. As I said, I switch bikes using the same head unit (the Garmin Edge 810) with 2 different power meters, sometimes every other day, and it does sometimes take a couple of attempts before it recognizes the INpower. I've persevered with the same battery now for around 2 months, so I think I was probably a little hasty to assume a change of batteries was needed.

After consultation with Rotor, it appears there have been some software issues, especially paired with Garmin head units. They say this has been addressed with their latest firmware update.  It is remarkably easy to find AA batteries pretty much anywhere, and it really is very easy to replace the battery, even with mitts on, so it's possibly with the ease of this solution that I failed to persevere with the lag in pairing. If I ride the same bike on consecutive days the Garmin generally does not need to search for the unit again.




It is perhaps the most understated of all power meters on the market though, and whether you like that or not, it does mean that all of the delicate stuff is tucked neatly away and protected by some of the strongest bits of the bike. As long as the seal stays tight it can probably withstand some ugly environments and rough treatment - ideal for MTB or Cross?

I love it when things just work. When you turn them on and they do what they're supposed to do, and never stop doing that. But it doesn't encourage lengthy discussion really. And so the summary of this review is basically that the INpower system does everything it should without a fuss and at a fraction of the cost of some of the top-end, and rather more finicky power meters on the market.

I've yet to get to grips with the pedal-stroke diagnostics. Having downloaded the required analytical program, it seems that I need a "translator" program to run a Windows OS software on my Mac, and the one suggested doesn't seem to work. I'll get down to this when I have more time. It all seems to be working well for the moment, so I'm not at all sure that I need much tweaking. I will get there.

All-in-all I would give this product a "highly recommended".

20 comments:

  1. Hey there,

    Nice littlereview. I am considering buying one of these INPOWERs. Don't you have any issues with the crank going into "sleep mode" and not properly recovering while on a ride and not pedaling for over 2 minutes? (like on a descent) Some users are reporting this particular issue.

    Cheers,

    Steven

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Steven, thanks. No, I haven't had that problem. However I think the battery problem I mention in the review may be due to an activation issue. I switch power meters when I switch bikes, and my Garmin sometimes takes a few attempts to recognise the INpower, but it always does eventually. If I don't switch bikes there's no issue.

      Delete
    2. This is a late response to Steven's problem. I had the same issue when paired with my Garmin Edge 500 and using a GSC-10 speed/cadence sensor. I've found that this happens if the power meter is detected before the speed/cadence sensor. If I get the head unit to detect the speed/cadence sensor first, then the problem doesn't occur.

      Tim

      Delete
  2. Thanks for the review. Did you measure it against a quark and if you did how did it compare? Bryan

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry Bryan, I can compare it only to the Powertap and Power2Max units that I've used. The Quark is a similar product to the power2max, though it's only standout feature from comments by friends is the shortness of it's battery life. Can't offer much help I'm afraid

      Delete
  3. Thanks so much for the reply.. Compared to the power2max did it read much lower or higher? I have a quark and recently got the vector S pedals for my TT bike but they read much lower than the quark. I have a power tap on my MTB and that reads the same as the quark. I'm asking because I don't find the vector S pedals to be comparable and want to replace them with the Rotor InPower

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The power2max was initially very similar in reading to the powertap, but I'm having some issues with it now as it is reading very low. The INpower seems to be pretty accurate - comparing with other guys on rides etc.

      Delete
  4. I have endless problens getting my INpower to work with Garmin 810 head unit. It randomly drops the power reading and returns zeros, despite pedalling consistently throughout. I've had it returned and tested by the distributor and they get it to work with a Garmin 510. I've done the basic things like changing batteries and torquing the crank.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Further to my previous comment I should also state that the software on both the Garmin 810 and the INPower is up to date. The Garmin 810 also works 100% on both of my Quarq power meters. There seems to be a specific bug in relation to the INpower's communication with Garmin 810 units.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Wilhelm, I have occasionally lost readings from the 810 after stopping for a while. If it doesn't come back after a search I'll restart the 810.
      There does seem to be some problem between these 2 units, but I can get it to work properly at least, so I'm obviously having better luck than you.

      Delete
  7. Hello and thanks for the review.
    I got my InPower in July 15. I have been using an old SRM with Garmin Edge 510 for the past couple of years and never had the slightest problem with it.
    As soon as I got the InPower I had to change the battery after about 30 hours of cycling.
    Brought it back to the bike shop - they changed the battery.
    Battery went dead again after about 30 hours.
    On my home trainer it would stop transmitting suddenly for a couple of minutes and start again.
    Send it back to Rotor - they claim there is no problem with the InPower.
    Put it back on my bike a month ago and in spite of Rotor apparently updating the InPower with the latest software I have the same problem starting this week with the battery...
    The bike shop contacted Rotor and they now say I have to buy an ANT+ stick and update myself the InPower which should rectify the problem...

    Any advise???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. From what I can gather the INpower seems to have problems with the Garmin Edge head units. I have the 810, and while it usually works fine, I do sometimes have to search for the power meter when starting up. Also, if the connection is dormant for a while, the Garmin seems to temporarily lose the ability to connect to the INpower. I have probably changed battery several times without needing to, simply because, despite sometimes restarting the Garmin several times, it still fails to connect. I have found that, when this happens, I need to turn the Garmin off for several minutes and then restart and search for the power meter again. Annoying, yes I know. I'm not sure what the problem is. Rotor don't seem to have an answer. I get around it by turning off the Garmin whenever I stop for a break, and making sure I don't freewheel the entire way down long descents.

      Delete
  8. I know this is a somewhat late comment but has anyone had an issue loading the Rotor software on a Mac (running OS X El Capitan)? I can't get any version of the Rotor software working despite having followed the instructions very carefully (including the mono framework). The installations seem to be successful but when I click on the Rotor icon in applications it doesn't open/load. I contacted Rotor - they tried to help but really didn't add any value other than suggesting earlier versions. I even had a professional computer "geek" (sorry, computer expert) try and sort things out and he also hit a dead-end. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I had much the same experience as you. I must say I didn't really persevere. Having already had issues with other gadgets not interfacing with Mac computers I am probably a bit defeatist about it. I would love to hear if anyone else has had more success though...

      Delete
  9. Nice Article to Read. Our LED stroboscopes use solid-state light sources that are very durable and long lived with no heat generation or drift over time.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Nice Article to Read. Digital torque wrenches capture peak torque or display torque measurement in real time mode. High and low setpoints with LED indicator and audible alarm facilitate Go/No Go testing.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Nice Article to Read. Imada digital force gauges capture peak force data and output data for collection by optional data acquisition software in USB, RS232, Digimatic and analog formats.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Nice Article to Read. Imada torque testers capture peak torque or display torque measurement in real time mode. High and low setpoints facilitate Go/No Go testing.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Nice Article to Read. Digital torque gauges are designed for clockwise and counter-clockwise torque testing. The Jacob’s chuck is a versatile attachment and can be used for a variety of applications.

    ReplyDelete